S
← US Companies

NVIDIA CORP

NVDA · Nasdaq · CIK 0001045810

SIC 3674

Semiconductors & Related Devices

Category

Electronics

Entity

operating

Incorp.

DE

Fiscal Y/E

0131

Source: SEC EDGAR · All filings on SEC →

Business Overview

Source: SEC 10-K

Our Company NVIDIA pioneered accelerated computing to help solve the most challenging computational problems. NVIDIA is now a data center scale AI infrastructure company reshaping all industries. Our technology stack includes the foundational NVIDIA CUDA development platform that runs on all NVIDIA GPUs, as well as hundreds of domain-specific software libraries, frameworks, algorithms, software development kits, or SDKs, and application programming interfaces, or APIs. This deep and broad software stack accelerates the performance and facilitates the deployment of NVIDIA accelerated computing for computationally intensive workloads such as artificial intelligence, or AI, model training and inference, data analytics, scientific computing, robotics, and 3D graphics, with vertical-specific optimizations to address industries ranging from healthcare and telecom to automotive and manufacturing. Introduced with the Blackwell architecture, our data-center-scale offerings feature extreme co-design where the infrastructure's chips, networking, systems, software, and algorithms are holistically architected and optimized to maximize performance and scale. Hundreds of thousands of GPUs can be interconnected to function as a single giant computer. This type of data center architecture and scale is needed for the development and deployment of modern AI and accelerated computing applications. The GPU was initially used to simulate human imagination, enabling the virtual worlds of video games and films. Today, it also simulates human intelligence, enabling a deeper understanding of language, science, and the physical world. Its parallel processing capabilities, supported by tens of thousands of computing cores, are essential for deep learning algorithms. This form of AI, in which software writes itself by learning from large amounts of data, can serve as the brain of computers, robots, and self-driving cars that can perceive, understand and reason about the world. GPU-powered AI solutions are being developed by thousands of enterprises to deliver services and products that would have been immensely difficult or even impossible with traditional coding. Examples include generative AI, which can create new content such as text, code, images, audio, video, molecule structures, and recommendation systems; and agentic AI where systems of AI models work in concert to automatically complete a task. NVIDIA has a platform strategy, bringing together hardware, systems, software, algorithms, libraries, AI models and training data sets, and services to create unique value for the markets we serve. While the computing requirements of these end markets are diverse, we address them with a unified underlying programmable architecture allowing us to support several multi-billion-dollar end markets with the same underlying technology by using a variety of software stacks developed either internally or by third-party developers and partners. The large and growing number of developers and installed base across our platforms strengthens our ecosystem and increases the value of our platform for our customers. Innovation is at our core. We have invested over $76.7 billion in research and development since our inception, yielding inventions that are essential to modern computing. Our invention of the GPU in 1999 sparked the growth of the PC gaming market and redefined computer graphics. With our introduction of CUDA in 2006, we opened the parallel processing capabilities of our GPU to a broad range of compute-intensive applications, paving the way for the emergence of modern AI. In 2012, the AlexNet neural network, trained on NVIDIA GPUs, won the ImageNet computer image recognition competition, marking the "Big Bang" moment of AI. We introduced our first Tensor Core GPU in 2017, built from the ground-up for the new era of AI, and our first autonomous driving system-on-chips, or SoC, in 2018. Our acquisition of Mellanox in 2020 expanded our offerings to include networking, enabled our platforms to be data center scale, and led to the introduction of a new processor class – the data processing unit, or DPU. Over the past 5 years, we have built full software stacks that run on top of our GPUs and CUDA to bring AI to the world's largest industries, including NVIDIA DRIVE stack for autonomous driving, Clara for healthcare, Omniverse for physical AI applications, and NVIDIA AI Enterprise software – essentially an operating system for enterprise AI applications. In 2023, we introduced our first data center CPU, Grace, built for giant-scale AI and high-performance computing, or HPC. In 2024, we launched the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture – connecting 36 Grace CPUs and 72 Blackwell GPUs in a data center scale, liquid-cooled design – for real-time trillion-parameter inference and training. In fiscal year 2026, we launched and scaled the NVIDIA Blackwell Ultra platform, optimized for agentic, reasoning, and physical AI. Building on the architectural breakthro

Investment Indicators

$209.66

-3.39 (-1.59%)

Open

$212.42

High

$213.60

Low

$209.23

Prev Close

$213.05

Volume

145,070,184

52W High

$236.54

52W Low

$129.13

50-day MA

$195.49

Quote as of: 2026-08-26

ROE

76.33%

Total Shareholder Yield

0.76%

Market Cap

$5.41T

P/E

34.22

P/B

33.97

PEG

0.70

EPS

6.53

BPS

6.47

Dividend Yield

0.02%

Beta

2.24

ROA

58.06%

D/E Ratio

0.31

Current Ratio

3.91

Gross Margin

71.07%

Operating Margin

60.38%

Net Margin

55.60%

Book Value/Share

$6.47

Intrinsic Value Estimates

Multiple valuation methods, each with its own assumptions — outputs can diverge widely

Median consensus (7 methods)

$651.87B

Deep overvalued +730.3%

Per-method implied market cap

Current market cap$5.41T
현재
Graham Number+730%
$651.87B
Graham Formula-23%
$7.02T
Justified P/E+201%
$1.80T
P/B 배수+2194%
$235.94B
P/S 배수+1153%
$431.88B
DCF (Gordon)+207%
$1.76T
DDM (Gordon)+32271%
$16.72B
Bar tintDeep undervaluedUndervaluedFairOvervaluedDeep overvalued
MethodImplied market capvs current

Graham Number

√(22.5 × 순이익 × 자본)

$651.87B+730%

Graham Formula

순이익 × (8.5 + 2 × 성장률%)

$7.02T-23%

Justified P/E

순이익 × 산업 평균 P/E

$1.80T+201%

P/B 배수

자본 × 산업 평균 P/B

$235.94B+2194%

P/S 배수

매출 × 산업 평균 P/S

$431.88B+1153%

DCF (Gordon)

CF × (1+g) / (r − g)

$1.76T+207%

DDM (Gordon)

D × (1+g) / (r − g)

$16.72B+32271%
Detailed analysis — formula walk-through & scenarios

Why this conclusion

Of the 7 valuation methods, 7 were applicable. Their median fair-value lands +730.3% below the current market cap → the stock trades above most formulas' estimates (overvalued). 6 methods flag overvalued, 1 flag undervalued, the rest land within fair range. Read each formula's assumptions below before treating any single number as the answer.

Graham Number

Overvalued +730.3%

√(22.5 × 순이익 × 자본)

What it measures · Benjamin Graham's conservative safety-margin formula. A high value requires both earnings and equity to be solid, so read it as 'the ceiling for a financially intact company.'

How it is computed · √(22.5 × NetIncome × Equity). 22.5 = max P/E 15 × max P/B 1.5 Graham would pay. Net income is latest FY consolidated net income from DART/XBRL; equity is total equity from the same filing.

When to trust it · Best for stable profitable industrials. Underestimates SaaS/platform/biotech because intangible-heavy businesses carry little book equity.

Current

$5.41T

Implied fair

$651.87B

Gap (current − fair)

+$4.76T(+730.3%)

NetIncome = $120.07B
Equity = $157.29B
√(22.5 × $120.07B × $157.29B) = $651.87B
  • 최대 PER 15배
  • 최대 PBR 1.5배
  • 안정적 흑자 기업 가정 (금융·고성장 부정확)

Graham Formula

Undervalued -22.9%

순이익 × (8.5 + 2 × 성장률%)

What it measures · Graham's 1962 revision that bakes growth into the multiple. Unlike the static Graham Number, this scales linearly with EPS growth so growth stocks aren't punished as hard.

How it is computed · NetIncome × (8.5 + 2g). 8.5 = base P/E for a zero-growth firm; 2g = +2× P/E for every 1pp of EPS growth. g is YoY EPS growth, clamped to [-5%, +25%] so a single big year doesn't blow up the estimate.

When to trust it · Works for firms with proven, somewhat stable growth. Misleading for first-year profits, swing years, or any period where g is distorted by a one-time charge or gain.

Current

$5.41T

Implied fair

$7.02T

Gap (current − fair)

$-1.61T(-22.9%)

NetIncome = $120.07B
Growth g = 64.7% → cap 25.0%
Multiple = 8.5 + 2 × 25.0 = 58.5×
$120.07B × 58.5 = $7.02T
  • EPS 성장률 64.7%/년 가정 (직전 1년 기준)
  • 무성장 기업 P/E = 8.5
  • 현재 적용 배수: 58.5x

Justified P/E

Overvalued +200.5%

순이익 × 산업 평균 P/E

What it measures · Relative-value benchmark — "should trade at the industry average P/E." Not an absolute intrinsic value; tells you how the firm prices vs its peer set.

How it is computed · NetIncome × industry P/E. Defaults to a market-wide 15× when no industry multiple is provided. Net income is the latest FY consolidated net income.

When to trust it · Most reliable in mature industries with comparable peers (banks, telcos, utilities, refiners). Less useful for big-tech / hardware where industry P/Es span 10×–60×.

Current

$5.41T

Implied fair

$1.80T

Gap (current − fair)

+$3.61T(+200.5%)

NetIncome = $120.07B
Industry P/E = 15×
$120.07B × 15 = $1.80T
  • 산업 평균 PER 15x 가정 (사용자 정의 가능)
  • 동종 업종 비교가 핵심 — 산업별 평균 P/E 사용 권장

P/B 배수

Overvalued +2194.0%

자본 × 산업 평균 P/B

What it measures · Multiplies book equity by industry P/B to imply a fair market cap. Best for asset-heavy businesses (banks, insurers, brokers, REITs) where balance-sheet value is the franchise.

How it is computed · Total Equity × industry P/B. Defaults to 1.5×. Equity is total equity (or parent-owners share) from the latest balance sheet.

When to trust it · Strongest for banks/insurers — asset-liability matching is the business. Materially under-prices SaaS, platforms, and brand-heavy businesses where intangible value dwarfs book equity.

Current

$5.41T

Implied fair

$235.94B

Gap (current − fair)

+$5.18T(+2194.0%)

Equity = $157.29B
Industry P/B = 1.5×
$157.29B × 1.5 = $235.94B
  • 산업 평균 PBR 1.5x 가정
  • 은행·보험·자산집약적 산업에 특히 유효

P/S 배수

Overvalued +1153.3%

매출 × 산업 평균 P/S

What it measures · Multiplies revenue by industry P/S. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage, restructuring) — revenue stays positive.

How it is computed · Revenue × industry P/S. Defaults to 2.0×. Revenue is the latest FY consolidated top line.

When to trust it · Ignores margin structure — a 30% operating margin business and a -5% one get the same multiple. Only meaningful within peer + margin cohort.

Current

$5.41T

Implied fair

$431.88B

Gap (current − fair)

+$4.98T(+1153.3%)

Revenue = $215.94B
Industry P/S = 2×
$215.94B × 2 = $431.88B
  • 산업 평균 PSR 2x 가정
  • 매출 기반 — 적자 기업·신생 기업에 적용 가능
  • 이익률 차이 무시

DCF (Gordon)

Overvalued +207.0%

CF × (1+g) / (r − g)

What it measures · Simplified Gordon-growth DCF — discounting perpetual cash flows. Extremely sensitive to the cash-flow / discount-rate / growth-rate inputs; trust the scenario grid more than the headline number.

How it is computed · FCF × (1+g) / (r − g). FCF preferred from XBRL/DART; falls back to NetIncome, then 5% of Revenue (rough proxy). Discount rate r = risk-free (4%) + equity premium (5%) = 9%. Growth g is EPS YoY clamped to [-2%, +6%], default 3%.

When to trust it · Strongest for steady, predictable businesses. When r-g approaches 0, the denominator blows up; near-perpetuity-growth combos are intentionally voided. Useless for cyclicals (semis, commodities, shipping) where g itself is noise.

Current

$5.41T

Implied fair

$1.76T

Gap (current − fair)

+$3.65T(+207.0%)

FCF = $102.72B
Discount r = 4.0% + 5.0% = 9.0%
Growth g = 6.0%
$102.72B × (1 + 6.0%) / (9.0% − 6.0%) = $3.63T
  • 현금흐름 입력: FCF (잉여현금흐름)
  • 할인율 9.0% (무위험 4.0% + 주식위험프리미엄 5.0%)
  • 영구 성장률 3.0% (0%~3% 범위 — 실질 GDP 한계)

DDM (Gordon)

Overvalued +32271.1%

D × (1+g) / (r − g)

What it measures · Values the firm purely on dividends paid to shareholders. Cleanest in theory, but only meaningful when management clearly intends to pay dividends — useless for share-repurchase-only payout policies.

How it is computed · D × (1+g) / (r − g). D from DART alotMatter (배당사항) or |CF dividendsPaid|. If absent, cascades to 30% of NetIncome (typical payout) → 30% of FCF → 1.5% of Revenue. r and g assumptions match DCF.

When to trust it · Most reliable for stable high-yielders (Korean utilities, tobacco, financial holdings). Sharply under-prices buyback-heavy firms (US big tech, parts of Korean IT) — look at the TSY column on the listing page to balance.

Current

$5.41T

Implied fair

$16.72B

Gap (current − fair)

+$5.40T(+32271.1%)

Dividend D = $974.00M
Discount r = 9.0%
Growth g = 6.0%
$974.00M × (1 + 6.0%) / (9.0% − 6.0%) = $34.41B
  • 배당 입력: 실제 지급 배당
  • 할인율 9.0%
  • 배당 영구 성장률 3.0% (0%~3% 범위 — 실질 GDP 한계)

DCF sensitivity: discount rate × terminal growth

Each cell is the (current vs FCF × (1+g) / (r − g)) discount % under the assumed growth g and discount r.

g \ r7%8%9%10%11%
1%+213.0%+265.2%+317.4%+369.5%+421.7%
2%+158.3%+210.0%+261.6%+313.3%+364.9%
3%+104.6%+155.8%+207.0%+258.1%+309.3%
4%+52.0%+102.7%+153.3%+204.0%+254.7%
5%+0.4%+50.6%+100.7%+150.9%+201.1%

DDM sensitivity: discount rate × dividend growth

Each cell is the discount % vs Dividend × (1+g) / (r − g) under the assumed growth g and discount r.

g \ r7%8%9%10%11%
1%+32912.1%+38414.2%+43916.2%+49418.2%+54920.2%
2%+27140.4%+32588.5%+38036.6%+43484.7%+48932.7%
3%+21480.8%+26875.9%+32271.1%+37666.3%+43061.5%
4%+15929.9%+21273.2%+26616.6%+31959.9%+37303.2%
5%+10484.8%+15777.3%+21069.7%+26362.1%+31654.5%

All estimates rest on strong assumptions. Treat the spread, not any single number, as the signal.

Showing the latest 5 years only

16 years of financials are available for this stock. Unlock the remaining 11 years (10+ year history) with Pro.

Upgrade to Pro · $1.99/mo

In USD millions (per-share figures shown directly) · Financials as of: 2026-02-25

핵심 지표 FY 2026

ROE

76.33%

총주주수익률

0.76%

PER

34.22

PBR

33.97

PSR

25.07

PEG

0.70

EV/EBITDA

40.47

배당수익률

0.02%

ROA

58.06%

부채비율

0.31

유동비율

3.91

매출총이익률

71.07%

영업이익률

60.38%

순이익률

55.60%

EPS

$6.53

BPS

$6.47

실적 추이

📄 SEC Filings

Other filings (84)
4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-08-24

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-08-12

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-08-07

Open →

SCHEDULE 13G

SCHEDULE 13G

xslSCHEDULE_13G_X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-07-20

Open →

3

3

FORM 3

2026-07-15

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-07-06

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-29

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-29

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-29

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-29

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-29

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-29

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-29

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-29

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-29

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-23

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-23

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-23

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-23

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-23

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-23

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-06-22

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-06-18

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-18

Open →

424B5

424B5

424B5

2026-06-17

Open →

FWP

FWP

FWP

2026-06-15

Open →

424B5

424B5

424B5

2026-06-15

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-10

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-05

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-06-04

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-06-03

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-05-29

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-05-27

Open →

SD

SD

SD

2026-05-15

Open →

3

3

FORM 3

2026-05-14

Open →

PX14A6G

PX14A6G

b513262px14a6g.htm

2026-05-13

Open →

ARS

ARS

ARS

2026-05-12

Open →

DEFA14A

DEFA14A

DEFA14A

2026-05-12

Open →

SCHEDULE 13G

SCHEDULE 13G

xslSCHEDULE_13G_X02/primary_doc.xml

2026-04-28

Open →

SCHEDULE 13G/A

SCHEDULE 13G/A

xslSCHEDULE_13G_X02/primary_doc.xml

2026-03-26

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-24

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-20

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-20

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-20

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-20

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-20

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-20

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-20

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-03-20

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-03-20

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-03-20

Open →

144/A

144/A

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-03-19

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-19

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-03-19

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-03-18

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-17

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-03-13

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-11

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-11

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-11

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-11

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-03-10

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-04

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-04

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-04

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-04

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-03-04

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-02-06

Open →

SCHEDULE 13G/A

SCHEDULE 13G/A

xslSCHEDULE_13G_X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-01-30

Open →

SCHEDULE 13G/A

SCHEDULE 13G/A

xslSCHEDULE_13G_X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-01-26

Open →

3

3

FORM 3

2026-01-26

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-01-23

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-01-23

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-01-21

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-01-15

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-01-09

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-01-07

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2026-01-06

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2026-01-02

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2025-12-22

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2025-12-22

Open →

144

144

xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

2025-12-19

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2025-12-19

Open →

4

Insider Transaction

FORM 4

2025-12-19

Open →